Review



anti mouse cd8a  (Bio X Cell)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio X Cell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio X Cell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8a
    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus <t>anti-CD8a</t> antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Anti Mouse Cd8a, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 636 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pmc13628106-246-7-9
    Average 97 stars, based on 636 article reviews
    anti mouse cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Senescent-Like Neutrophils Shape Angiogenic Immunosuppressive Niches in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis"

    Article Title: Senescent-Like Neutrophils Shape Angiogenic Immunosuppressive Niches in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

    Journal: Cancer Discovery

    doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-25-0820

    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus anti-CD8a antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus anti-CD8a antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Expressing, Staining, Analysis, Migration, Control

    Related Articles

    Control:

    Article Title: FOXO1-driven metabolic reprogramming of hematomal CD8 + T cells drives the expansion of perihematomal edema following intracerebral hemorrhage
    Article Snippet: .. To investigate the role of hematomal CD8 + T cells in ICH, donor C57BL/6 mice were pretreated with intraperitoneal injections of an anti-mouse CD8a antibody (BE0061, BioXcell) for CD8 + T-cell depletion or a rat IgG2b isotype (BE0090, BioXcell) as a control [ ]. ..

    Article Title: FOXO1-driven metabolic reprogramming of hematomal CD8 + T cells drives the expansion of perihematomal edema following intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Article Snippet: .. To investigate the role of hematomal CD8+ T cells in ICH, donor C57BL/6 mice were pretreated with intraperitoneal injections of an anti-mouse CD8a antibody (BE0061, BioXcell) for CD8+ T-cell depletion or a rat IgG2b isotype (BE0090, BioXcell) as a control [39]. .. To investigate the role of hematomal CD8+ T cells in ICH, donor C57BL/6 mice were pretreated with intraperitoneal injections of an anti-mouse CD8a antibody (BE0061, BioXcell) for CD8+ T-cell depletion or a rat IgG2b isotype (BE0090, BioXcell) as a control [39].

    other:

    Article Title: AWT020: a novel fusion protein harnessing PD-1 blockade and selective IL-2 Cis-activation for enhanced anti-tumor immunity and diminished toxicity.
    Article Snippet: MC38 murine colon cancer cell line, CT26 murine colon cancer cell line, EMT6 murine mammary carcinoma cell line, and B16F10 murine melanoma cell line were acquired from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Article Title: BRAF/MEK inhibition induces cell state transitions boosting immune checkpoint sensitivity in BRAF V600E -mutant glioma
    Article Snippet: anti-mouse CD8a antibody, clone 53–6.7 , Bio X Cell , Cat# BE0004-1.

    Injection:

    Article Title: The cold immunological landscape of ATM-deficient cancers.
    Article Snippet: IgG (2A3, Bio X Cell, 100 μg) or anti- PD- 1 (RMP1- 14, Bio X Cell 100 μg) antibodies were administered intraperitoneally in 100 μL of PBS twice weekly (every 3–4 days). .. For CD8+ T- cell depletion, anti- mouse CD8a antibody (2.43, Bio X Cell, 250 μg) was injected intraperitoneally at days 0, 3, 10 and 17 after the injection of 4T1 cells to the mammary fat pad. ..

    Article Title: Methods and compositions for treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Article Snippet: .. T Cell Depletion CD4 and CD8 cells were depleted by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 250 μg of anti-mouse CD4 antibody (clone GK1.5, BioXcell, In VivoPlus) and 250 μg of anti-mouse CD8a antibody (clone 2.43, BioXcell, In VivoPlus). .. Control mice were treated with rat IgG2b isotype control (clone LTF-2, BioXcell, InVivoPlus).



    Similar Products

    97
    Miltenyi Biotec antibodies 130 104 075
    Antibodies 130 104 075, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/CD8a%2B+T+Cell+Isolation+Kit%2C+mouse/10__1158_slash_2159___8290__cd___25___1411-508-20-13
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies 130 104 075 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress f anti cd8 α antibody
    F Anti Cd8 α Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/Anti-Mouse+CD8a+Antibody/pm42261844-195-11-15
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    f anti cd8 α antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8a
    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus <t>anti-CD8a</t> antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Anti Mouse Cd8a, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pmc13628106-246-7-9
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech gb21303 apc anti mouse cd8a antibody proteintech
    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus <t>anti-CD8a</t> antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Gb21303 Apc Anti Mouse Cd8a Antibody Proteintech, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/APC+Anti-mouse+CD8a/pm42810343-283-261-266
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gb21303 apc anti mouse cd8a antibody proteintech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Bio X Cell anti cd8a
    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus <t>anti-CD8a</t> antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Anti Cd8a, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pm42782159-280-25-29
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech pe anti mouse cd8
    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus <t>anti-CD8a</t> antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.
    Pe Anti Mouse Cd8, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/PE+Anti-mouse+CD8a/pm42785880-55-14-21
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe anti mouse cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Elabscience Biotechnology pe anti mouse cd8 alpha antibody
    Overexpression of UPF1 in ccRCC inhibits M2 macrophage polarization and enhances the tumor suppressor function of <t>CD8</t> + T cells, Caki-1 cell groups of sh-NC+PBS, sh-UPF1+PBS, or sh-UPF1 + 2-DG, and the conditioned medium was used to culture and polarize M0 macrophages. The polarized macrophages were cultured with activated CD8 + T cells. (A) CFSE assessed CD8 + T cell proliferative capacity. (B) Flow cytometry measured apoptosis rate of CD8 + T cells in different co-culture systems. (C) CD8 + T cells from culture systems were co-cultured with normal Caki-1 cells, with LDH assays determining cytotoxic effect of CD8 + T cells. *, p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; 2-DG, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.
    Pe Anti Mouse Cd8 Alpha Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/PE+Anti-Mouse+CD8a+Antibody/pmc13642288-120-47-53
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe anti mouse cd8 alpha antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec anti cd8 apc
    Overexpression of UPF1 in ccRCC inhibits M2 macrophage polarization and enhances the tumor suppressor function of <t>CD8</t> + T cells, Caki-1 cell groups of sh-NC+PBS, sh-UPF1+PBS, or sh-UPF1 + 2-DG, and the conditioned medium was used to culture and polarize M0 macrophages. The polarized macrophages were cultured with activated CD8 + T cells. (A) CFSE assessed CD8 + T cell proliferative capacity. (B) Flow cytometry measured apoptosis rate of CD8 + T cells in different co-culture systems. (C) CD8 + T cells from culture systems were co-cultured with normal Caki-1 cells, with LDH assays determining cytotoxic effect of CD8 + T cells. *, p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; 2-DG, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.
    Anti Cd8 Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/CD8a+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13355016-9-0-2
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd8 apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec anti mouse cd8 microbead miltenyi biotec
    Overexpression of UPF1 in ccRCC inhibits M2 macrophage polarization and enhances the tumor suppressor function of <t>CD8</t> + T cells, Caki-1 cell groups of sh-NC+PBS, sh-UPF1+PBS, or sh-UPF1 + 2-DG, and the conditioned medium was used to culture and polarize M0 macrophages. The polarized macrophages were cultured with activated CD8 + T cells. (A) CFSE assessed CD8 + T cell proliferative capacity. (B) Flow cytometry measured apoptosis rate of CD8 + T cells in different co-culture systems. (C) CD8 + T cells from culture systems were co-cultured with normal Caki-1 cells, with LDH assays determining cytotoxic effect of CD8 + T cells. *, p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; 2-DG, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.
    Anti Mouse Cd8 Microbead Miltenyi Biotec, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/CD8a+(Ly-2)+MicroBeads%2C+mouse/pm42341754-218-20-23
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd8 microbead miltenyi biotec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec cd8a fitc clone 53 6 7
    Purity of <t>CD8</t> + T cells after magnetic isolation Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the percentage of CD8 + T cells following negative selection.
    Cd8a Fitc Clone 53 6 7, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd8a+antibody/CD8a+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse/pmc13273787-21-0-13
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd8a fitc clone 53 6 7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus anti-CD8a antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.

    Journal: Cancer Discovery

    Article Title: Senescent-Like Neutrophils Shape Angiogenic Immunosuppressive Niches in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

    doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-25-0820

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Proangiogenic and immunosuppression phenotype of TANs in the CRLM microenvironment. A, Heatmap showing signature scores for angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, neutrophil cytotoxicity, MDSC, and NET across each TAN and PMN subset. B, Comparison of angiogenesis, myeloid cell recruitment, MDSC, and NET signature scores among TAN and PMN subsets. C, Dot plot illustrating expression levels of major cytokines and chemokines in each TAN and PMN subset. D, Representative IHC images of CD31 staining in CRLM tissues. Scale bars, 50 µm. E, Correlation analysis between CD31 and TAN1 density using Spearman’s rank correlation ( n = 102). F, Representative images and quantification of tube formation in HUVECs when cocultured with conditioned medium from human LGALS3 − neutrophils or LGALS3 + neutrophils ( n = 6). G, UMAP plot showing six monocyte/macrophage subsets across colorectal cancer, adjacent liver tissues, CRLM, and PB samples. H, Shell-like plot depicting ligand–receptor interaction strength between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. I, Selected ligand–receptor interactions between TAN1_LGASL3 and neutrophil/monocyte/macrophage subset in CRLM. J, Representative mIHC images of CD68, CCL3L1, CD66b, CCR1, and BHLHE40 in CRLM. Scale bars, 50 µm. K, Representative images of macrophage migration assays and effects of conditioned medium from human LGALS3 + neutrophils on migration of macrophages (induced from THP-1 cells) in the presence of CCR1 inhibitor (BX471) or anti-CCL3 antibody ( n = 6). L, Comparison of immunosuppressive macrophage signature scores between colorectal cancer and CRLM. M, Schematic of the CRLM mouse model. C57BL/6 mice received intrasplenic injections of mouse colorectal cancer cells (MC38). Mice were subsequently treated with IgG control (IgG; n = 6), anti-Ly6G antibody (anti-Ly6G; n = 6), or anti-Ly6G plus anti-CD8a antibodies (anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a; n = 6). Livers were harvested on day 14. N, Representative images of liver metastases from IgG, anti-Ly6G, and anti-Ly6G + anti-CD8a groups. O, Comparison of liver weights among the three groups. P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( B and L ) and unpaired Student t test ( F , K , and O ). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. CRC, colorectal cancer; Ctrl, control.

    Article Snippet: For CD8 + T-cell depletion, 200 μg anti-mouse CD8a (Bio X Cell, BE0061, RRID: AB_1125541) was injected intraperitoneally twice a week.

    Techniques: Comparison, Expressing, Staining, Analysis, Migration, Control

    Overexpression of UPF1 in ccRCC inhibits M2 macrophage polarization and enhances the tumor suppressor function of CD8 + T cells, Caki-1 cell groups of sh-NC+PBS, sh-UPF1+PBS, or sh-UPF1 + 2-DG, and the conditioned medium was used to culture and polarize M0 macrophages. The polarized macrophages were cultured with activated CD8 + T cells. (A) CFSE assessed CD8 + T cell proliferative capacity. (B) Flow cytometry measured apoptosis rate of CD8 + T cells in different co-culture systems. (C) CD8 + T cells from culture systems were co-cultured with normal Caki-1 cells, with LDH assays determining cytotoxic effect of CD8 + T cells. *, p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; 2-DG, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: UPF1-dependent glycolysis driven by LINC00887 facilitates macrophage M2 polarization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1833383

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Overexpression of UPF1 in ccRCC inhibits M2 macrophage polarization and enhances the tumor suppressor function of CD8 + T cells, Caki-1 cell groups of sh-NC+PBS, sh-UPF1+PBS, or sh-UPF1 + 2-DG, and the conditioned medium was used to culture and polarize M0 macrophages. The polarized macrophages were cultured with activated CD8 + T cells. (A) CFSE assessed CD8 + T cell proliferative capacity. (B) Flow cytometry measured apoptosis rate of CD8 + T cells in different co-culture systems. (C) CD8 + T cells from culture systems were co-cultured with normal Caki-1 cells, with LDH assays determining cytotoxic effect of CD8 + T cells. *, p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; 2-DG, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies included: FITC Mouse monoclonal to CD68 (ab134351, abcam, UK), Pacific Blue anti-human CD86 Antibody (305417, yajimall, China), CD206 (MMR) Monoclonal Antibody (19.2)-PE (12-2069-42, ThermoFisher, USA), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 Anti-Mouse F4/80 Antibody (E-AB-F0995J, Elabscience, China), PE Anti-CD206 mouse antibody (E-AB-F1135D, Elabscience, China), APC Anti-mouse CD3 antibody (E-AB-F1013E, Elabscience, China), PE Anti-mouse CD8 alpha antibody (E-AB-F1104D, Elabscience, China).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Co-culture Assay

    LINC00887/UPF1-mediated aerobic glycolysis leads to lactic acid accumulation and facilitates immune evasion in ccRCC in vivo , A syngeneic tumor model was developed by injecting BALB/c mice with Renca cells expressing sh-NC or sh-LINC00887, followed by treatment with sh-NC or sh-UPF1 lentivirus. A-C: Assessment of tumor size (A) , volume (B) , and weight (C) . (D, E) qRT-PCR analyses for LINC00887 (D) and UPF1 (E) mRNA levels. (F) IHC analysis for UPF1, LDH-A, KI67 protein levels. (G) Kit assay for lactate levels in tumors. (H) Proportion of M2 macrophages (F4/80+CD206+) by flow cytometry. (I) Immunofluorescence assay for CD206+ macrophages. (J) Proportion of CD8 + T cells (CD3 + CD8 + ) in tumor tissues. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; LDH-A, Lactate dehydrogenase A; CD206, Mannose receptor C-type 1; CD3, Cluster of differentiation 3; CD8, Cluster of differentiation 8.

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: UPF1-dependent glycolysis driven by LINC00887 facilitates macrophage M2 polarization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1833383

    Figure Lengend Snippet: LINC00887/UPF1-mediated aerobic glycolysis leads to lactic acid accumulation and facilitates immune evasion in ccRCC in vivo , A syngeneic tumor model was developed by injecting BALB/c mice with Renca cells expressing sh-NC or sh-LINC00887, followed by treatment with sh-NC or sh-UPF1 lentivirus. A-C: Assessment of tumor size (A) , volume (B) , and weight (C) . (D, E) qRT-PCR analyses for LINC00887 (D) and UPF1 (E) mRNA levels. (F) IHC analysis for UPF1, LDH-A, KI67 protein levels. (G) Kit assay for lactate levels in tumors. (H) Proportion of M2 macrophages (F4/80+CD206+) by flow cytometry. (I) Immunofluorescence assay for CD206+ macrophages. (J) Proportion of CD8 + T cells (CD3 + CD8 + ) in tumor tissues. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05. cRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; UPF1, Up-frameshift protein 1; LDH-A, Lactate dehydrogenase A; CD206, Mannose receptor C-type 1; CD3, Cluster of differentiation 3; CD8, Cluster of differentiation 8.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies included: FITC Mouse monoclonal to CD68 (ab134351, abcam, UK), Pacific Blue anti-human CD86 Antibody (305417, yajimall, China), CD206 (MMR) Monoclonal Antibody (19.2)-PE (12-2069-42, ThermoFisher, USA), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 Anti-Mouse F4/80 Antibody (E-AB-F0995J, Elabscience, China), PE Anti-CD206 mouse antibody (E-AB-F1135D, Elabscience, China), APC Anti-mouse CD3 antibody (E-AB-F1013E, Elabscience, China), PE Anti-mouse CD8 alpha antibody (E-AB-F1104D, Elabscience, China).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Analysis, Flow Cytometry, Immunofluorescence

    Purity of CD8 + T cells after magnetic isolation Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the percentage of CD8 + T cells following negative selection.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol for co-culture of murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells with OT-I mouse CD8 + T cells to evaluate immune activation efficacy

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104621

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Purity of CD8 + T cells after magnetic isolation Representative flow cytometry analysis showing the percentage of CD8 + T cells following negative selection.

    Article Snippet: CD8a FITC clone 53–6.7 (Dilution: 2 μL in 100 μL FACS buffer) , Miltenyi Biotec , Cat. no. 130-118-468.

    Techniques: Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Selection

    Antigen-specific CD8 + T cell activation after co-culture with transfected BMDCs (A) Percentages of IFN- γ -producing CD8 + T cells after 6 h of co-culture with transfected BMDCs. (B) CD8 + T cell proliferation assessed by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution after 72 h of co-culture, shown as the percentage of divided cell subsets.

    Journal: STAR Protocols

    Article Title: Protocol for co-culture of murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells with OT-I mouse CD8 + T cells to evaluate immune activation efficacy

    doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2026.104621

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antigen-specific CD8 + T cell activation after co-culture with transfected BMDCs (A) Percentages of IFN- γ -producing CD8 + T cells after 6 h of co-culture with transfected BMDCs. (B) CD8 + T cell proliferation assessed by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution after 72 h of co-culture, shown as the percentage of divided cell subsets.

    Article Snippet: CD8a FITC clone 53–6.7 (Dilution: 2 μL in 100 μL FACS buffer) , Miltenyi Biotec , Cat. no. 130-118-468.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Transfection